According to the Oxford
text, Russian courts hosted opera as far back as the innovations of Opera Buffa
in the 18th century. Domenico
Cimerosa composed Il Matrimonio Segreto for a Russian court and was very
well received during its lifetime. This was, to be sure, not native opera; in
fact, the first libretto in the Russian language was written in 1755 but was
also written by an Italian imported composer to the region. Rather, the
subjects were set in Italian language as they were in a great deal of Europe
during the 1700’s, but it does provide a lineage to the more native styles that
would emerge later in the 19th century with the likes of Glinka,
Tchaikovsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Mussorgsky and later Shostakovich and Prokofiev. The reasons for non-indigenous opera in the
Slovak countries seems a simple enough problem to solve, after all, it was an
Italian import into the rest of Europe, but it wasn’t until after the adoption
of European culture and style (particularly French and German) under Peter the
Great, that Russia began to emerge as a cultural center partially out of
assimilation (as in Tchaikovsky) and partly out of Rebellion (Mussorgsky).
The first
opera that was sung continually in Russian was A Life for the Tsar (1836) by
Mikhail Glinka. The story is a relatively simple one, essentially it is the
tale of a young married couple, the Juvenile is charged with leading invading
Poles away from the newly elected Romanoff sovereign. The young man is successful
but because of his deception he is killed.
Glinka went on to write another great opera in the piece Ruslan and
Lyudmila (1837-1842) which was very Russian in its origins of being adapted
from a poem of Pushkin, but bears a great deal of relationship to the fantasy
operas of Romantic Germany as it contains wizards, fairies and other sorts of
magical characters and prophecy. While
Glinka held fast to many Italian styles of opera including the recitative/aria
format, he did generate certain validity for opera in the Russian language on
Russian subjects that would be inherited by younger composers.
The Later
developments in Russian opera that unfolded in the 19th century were
linked to Rimsky-Korsakov, Tchaikovsky and Mussorgsky. Rimsky-Korsakov was the most prolific of the
three, composing a total of 15 operas, however; his is best known for The
Golden Cockerel (1909) which was another fairly tale opera that contains within
it the famous “Flight of the Bumblebee.” As far as Tchaikovsky is concerned, he
is seen as something sort of backwards from the history of opera in Russia,
whereas the beginning of the genre had to do with foreign styles influencing
native stories, Tchaikovsky looked elsewhere for settings for his stage-works. Many of his operas take place outside of
Slovak countries and even his most well known work Evgeny Ongen is only
partially set in Russia and was successful for its more profound examination of
character relationships. John Tyrrell
writes; “In the latter two operas [The Enchantress and Evgeny] the Russian
element penetrates no further than Act 1, but where the Enchantress, like so
many of Tchaikovsky’s operas, fails, and where Onegin triumphantly succeeds, is
in the level of personal engagement.”
Finally the discussion in the Oxford text turns to the issue of realism
in Russian opera, the principal figure here is Modest Mussorgsky who believed
very strongly in speech-rhythms being represented in song. Mussorgsky had a terrible time completing
operas as he attempted several but was only able to finish one; Boris Godunov
(1874) which is notable for its prose settings of text that avoids too much in
terms of song-structure in the original, (later in a revised version solo songs
and duets were added).
The 20th
century would see many changes to the Russian landscape, the Soviet Revolution
had deposed the royal family of Russia and now a new “dictatorship of the
proletariat” was established. Originally under the direction of V.I. Lenin the
fledgling nation of the USSR would seek to relegate art to artists and
intellectuals, art was also a low priority with the government due to the
bloody civil war that was sweeping the nation. It wasn’t until the death of
Lenin that the ineptly educated Joseph Stalin ascended to total power over the
country. Stalin’s narrow idea of artistic ability lay with only precision in
realism and during that period both the visual and performing arts would enter
a much prescribed scenario. The two
major composers writing at this time were Shostakovich and Prokofiev.
Shostakovich is known best (in terms of opera) for his Lady Macbeth of the
Mtsensk District (1934) musically very successful but mostly infamous for the
ban of its performance directed by Stalin after seeing a production of the
piece. Lady Macbeth did challenge
conventions on moral grounds as well as the role of women in society (being
married to man when she is in love with another) but it is the work’s central
place in the history of censorship that makes it so notable from an historical perspective.
Sergey Prokofiev was the composer of a
handful of operas including The Fiery Angel, the Gambler and Semyon Kotko. The
Oxford text notes; The Love for Three Oranges for the fact that it “unlooses
the ostinatos from any psychological purpose, and instead has them spinning the
wheels of a comic fantasy.”
It should
be noted that during any discussion of the Soviet Union, there is sometimes a
tendency to lump the Lenin/Stalin legacy together when it comes not only to art
but also to political policy. According to the biography by Robert Payne, Lenin
was willing to leave artistic matters to the artists and rather wanted to focus
on overall education, Lenin himself was an avid fan of Beethoven’s music as
well as many other classics. This in some ways is to be expected as in his
youth, the young Vladimir had a very liberal education and was a practicing
lawyer (in-between his revolutionary activities). Stalin, by contrast, did not
receive the same kind of liberal education; he was a staunchly conservative man
who was notoriously rude. This is not meant to oversimplify the situation in
the USSR, this is simply to point out that there was a great difference in the
visions of the two men for what the Soviet Union was to become.
No comments:
Post a Comment