Trying
to choose just one aspect of electronic music is difficult for me. When I was
20 years old I decided that I would pursue the life of a pop musician, I had
taken piano lessons for a long time and therefore I decided that my instrument
would be keyboards. My first was a Korg Z1 then I moved to an MS2000, Yamaha
DX27, and Rhodes Piano and Roland Hammond organ emulator. I learned to use
recording and synthesis software (Sonar and plug-ins, usually Kontakt but also
EastWest platforms, Vocaloid and Reason). I mention all of this because with
the advent of music recording in the home, I think there is a tendency on the
part of younger people to think that electronic music has only to do with their
generation. It was very interesting to
me, to read about the long developments in the art world on the part of
Stockhausen and Babbitt which contributed greatly to the development of
electronic music studios where a great deal of groundbreaking research had been
done.
I
suppose if I have to define “electronic” music, it would be music in which some
kind of electronic synthesis was involved. It would be easy to define
compositions for tape as electronic pieces because there is a mechanical device
being used for music which operates on electricity. But electricity is the
workhorse in this relationship and not the focus. In other words, electricity
provides the means for an analogue sound to be transmitted, but the sound being
produced is not electronic, it is simply a reproduction of a non-electronic
origin. For this reason, I have to lump all samplers into the same category,
therefore; the Melotron is not a focus for consideration because it was a tape
machine that could be played like a piano. So, it appears as though I am left
with the Theremin, the Odes Martinot, and the synthesizers of Buchla, Robert
Moog as well as those of RCA.
Almost
everyone who does Hip-Hop, Slowcore, Trip-Hop, Funk, House, Techno, Jungle and
every other genre of popular electronic music owns a T-shirt that says “moog.”
This is a lasting testament to the legacy of Bob Moog. It is interesting that
the company which bears his name is still producing analog synthesizers, except
the new models are complete with modern
digital interfaces that make it simple to sync up to a computer (about 7 years
ago, retrofitting an old moog with a new midi patch was all the rage, it seems
like the company got the hint). What is truly interesting is that very rarely
are stand-alone keyboards and synthesizers being used any more. For the most
part, computers have become so powerful that the software emulators are almost
every bit as versatile and pristine as the old models but in a very manageable
form. Now, electronic musicians can access the sound of an old moog or vintage
Korg by simply routing a plug-in to their sequencer of choice. This was
unthinkable only 10 years ago (perhaps even 5 years ago) but now is common
place. This is probably a byproduct of computers reaching upwards of 2 TB of
hard-drive space, with 4-8 GB of RAM and multiple CPU. With all of this in
mind, I find it miraculous that composers such as Stockhausen and Babbitt were
able to do the kind of work they did on those old machines. I also feel a
little saddened that Varese did not live to see an age that I truly think he
would have enjoyed.
No comments:
Post a Comment