In
response to the questions posed as to which individuals and their compositional
methods are varying degrees of traditional or contemporary, I found myself with
the same answer for each, and that was dependant on the use of folk music. In many ways, folk music represents the most
traditional of all genres of music and yet it existed largely unappreciated in
the concert halls for a long period of history. As mentioned earlier, Mozart’s Turkish
Rondo, Haydn’s “Gypsy” Trio, Beethoven’s arrangements of Russian songs for
pedagogical purposes and pieces like that did include both folk music and
exotic elements, but it seems as though this was (in the Classical/Romantic
period) as a quaint ornament to otherwise strict Germanic compositional styles.
It seems, however; that the boldness of Stravinsky, Bartok, Kodaly, Janacek and
others to outright say “folk music was my inspiration for this melody” or to
write in a folk music style was to bring traditional national cultural music
into popular perception. It is interesting that similar experiments in
recording and cataloging music of the Native American’s were happening around
the same time that Bartok was doing his research (according to the text An Introduction to America’s Music by
Richard Crawford).
In the
sense that concert hall music is traditional, to me, no figure stands out more
than Rachmaninoff. Here is an individual that lived well into the 20th
century, enjoyed a great deal of success and is still regularly performed today
(the Van Cliburn competition which wrapped up recently featured many pianists
playing the 2nd and 3rd piano concerto to a very
enthusiastic audience). The concertos
are indeed beautiful expressions of grand writing for the piano and orchestra,
as are the Variations on a Theme by Paganini. These pieces are often melodically
lyrical, moody with sections that tend to tap into that part of an audience
that is looking for a rush. The greatest example of Rachmaninoff’s writing that
shows his traditional, yet contemporary side is the very well known Prelude in
C Sharp Minor. In many ways the harmonies of this piece are very Romantic
recalling remnants of Chopin’s Prelude in C minor. On the other hand, the piece
seems to have a clear ABA form with much more variation than many classical
preludes tended to have (admittedly, many Romantic preludes do though, again,
Chopin comes to mind in the way his “Raindrops” prelude changes as well as
several others). In the end, it seems as though Rachmaninoff’s most novel
aspect was the fact that he maintained what was becoming seen by his
contemporaries as an “antiquated” style. However, the pieces’ enduring
popularity against his contemporizes perhaps means that Rachmaninoff was (and
still is) in line with popular trends.
The
final figure, for this discussion, is Ravel. In the interest of full
disclosure, growing up as a young music student, Ravel was my favorite composer
and I worked very hard trying to imitate his style (eventually my composition
teacher began to scold me for doing this).
Ravel was hardly the only composer to write music for the left hand
alone, however; the Concerto for left hand stands out as a remarkable
achievement, especially when pitted against the massive chord voicing in
Rachmaninoff. In a very profound way though, this is an incredibly traditional
method as many of the first keyboard instruments (such as the portative organ)
were often played with only one hand.
Ravel was also very novel in his use of Jazz aspects in his pieces,
however; the aspects of Jazz which were incorporated into his works (such as
the sliding and saxophone use in Bolero were in practice and common in the 19th
century in the Americas. The piano concerto in G has a great deal of bitonality
and incredible virtuosity but it remains a Classical Concerto that follows a
fast-slow-fast format. This is probably the biggest point above all the others;
regardless of the use of dissonance, or dissonant sounds, odd meters or any of
the exploited techniques used by composers of the 20th century,
often these individuals were still writing titles such as “symphony” “concerto”
and “prelude.” To be fair, there were
some free-formed pieces being written, but it would have been impossible for
the new composers to completely sever ties with the previous 3 centuries.
No comments:
Post a Comment